Author: James Thompson
Date: 12:34:12 07/23/00
I have both Fritz 6.0 and CB 7.0 so I thought I’d cannibalize the Fritz database and place the extra games into my reference database (CB 7.0). I got some interesting results. After cannibalizing, CB 7.0 identified a little over 11,000 games not included in its database. However, after the copying process was completed only a little over 1,000 games were ultimately added to the reference library. Copy parameters were as follows: opening classification, theme classification, don’t copy single doubles and always import VCs were all checked. Why didn’t the cannibalize process catch these duplicate games? The “detect doubles algorithm” in CB 7.0 is fully explained but the cannibalize process isn’t. I assumed it used a similar process. What am I missing? James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.