Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 06:01:35 11/17/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 16, 1997 at 15:10:58, Keith Ian Price wrote: [snip] >I don't know. But it seems, up to the point he was expelled, that he was >following the rules that were given him here, albeit to the letter, and >perhaps not the spirit. If you want to expand the rules to include other >behavior, you should do that, warn him, and then if he continues expel >him. It just seems in this case, that the CCC founders weren't following >the rules they had set down. >kp I am personally not interested in sharing a forum with someone that is trying to harm as much as possible anyone that doesn't keep a low profile. Whether RT acts this way in RGCC or in CCC, my rejection will be the same. The only difference is that in CCC I can try to do something about it. As for rules, it's not realistic to pretend a rule formulation for every conceivable case, much less in a new froum like CCC. Therefore at times we have to play it by ear. And it doesn't take a keen ear to realise what RT and Anonymous are doing in RGCC. From insulting campaigns to asking for program crackers, the purpose is only one: inflicting as much damage as possible. My personal position: I had it. Enough. Out of compassion for someone I consider torn and out of his mind I tried to establish contact, even some friendship, through email as recently as last August. I wasted my time. No more. Reconsidering this case is a waste of time. Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.