Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:06:08 07/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 2000 at 15:59:31, Chris Carson wrote: >The SSDF Rating List 1997-02-05 >53540 games played by 162 computers > Rating +- Games Won Oppo > ------ --- ----- --- ---- > 1 Rebel 8.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2462 27 736 67% 2336 > 2 MChess Pro 6.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2435 27 683 62% 2350 > 3 Hiarcs 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2427 67 121 60% 2359 > 4 Genius 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2420 30 558 59% 2352 > > >Avg Rating for the top 4 programs = 2436. > >If DB had a 90% (+36 =4 -0) score against these programs, >then the DB rating in comp vs comp games would have been 2824. >It's TPR against Kasparov was 2862 (human vs comp). > >Here is current SSDF list > >The SSDF Rating List 2000-04-07 >72059 games played by 206 computers > Rating + - Games Won oppo >1 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2721 39 -37 368 67% 2594 >2 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2689 31 -30 565 68% 2557 >3 Tiger 12.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2671 33 -32 486 64% 2572 > >97 DB would still be the top rated computer at 2824, however, >the difference between 97 DB and the current #1 would only be >about 100 points or about the difference between the current #1 and > >8 Crafty 17.07/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2624 46 -44 251 62% 2541 > >It would be very interesting to see the ratings for multi Fritz >or Deep Junior on 8x-700 HW. :) Did you ever notice that the SSDF does not even post the results when the number of games is that small? Look at the standard deviations and you will know why.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.