Author: Chris Carson
Date: 13:35:51 07/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 2000 at 16:06:08, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 24, 2000 at 15:59:31, Chris Carson wrote: > >>The SSDF Rating List 1997-02-05 >>53540 games played by 162 computers >> Rating +- Games Won Oppo >> ------ --- ----- --- ---- >> 1 Rebel 8.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2462 27 736 67% 2336 >> 2 MChess Pro 6.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2435 27 683 62% 2350 >> 3 Hiarcs 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2427 67 121 60% 2359 >> 4 Genius 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2420 30 558 59% 2352 >> >> >>Avg Rating for the top 4 programs = 2436. >> >>If DB had a 90% (+36 =4 -0) score against these programs, >>then the DB rating in comp vs comp games would have been 2824. >>It's TPR against Kasparov was 2862 (human vs comp). >> >>Here is current SSDF list >> >>The SSDF Rating List 2000-04-07 >>72059 games played by 206 computers >> Rating + - Games Won oppo >>1 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2721 39 -37 368 67% 2594 >>2 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2689 31 -30 565 68% 2557 >>3 Tiger 12.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2671 33 -32 486 64% 2572 >> >>97 DB would still be the top rated computer at 2824, however, >>the difference between 97 DB and the current #1 would only be >>about 100 points or about the difference between the current #1 and >> >>8 Crafty 17.07/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2624 46 -44 251 62% 2541 >> >>It would be very interesting to see the ratings for multi Fritz >>or Deep Junior on 8x-700 HW. :) > >Did you ever notice that the SSDF does not even post the results when the number >of games is that small? Look at the standard deviations and you will know why. Ofcourse I agree with you here Dan that 40 games has a high error of measure. I am not sure 97 DB could replicate the 90% score against P90 HW and certainly do not accept it against 450mhz or 8x-700. :) Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.