Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:11:41 07/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 24, 2000 at 20:51:23, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 24, 2000 at 20:31:10, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>For being a new Winboard chess program YACE 0.21 is almost as solid as the >>Default CM6000. I wonder how the newer version of YACE 0.22 or even Crafty >>17.11 will perfom against the default CM6000 Settings. > >Suggestion: >Run ELOSTAT 1.1 against your PGN file and look at the size of the error bars. > >While your assertion may be true, you will find that there is an enormous degree >of uncertainty, when you base the outcome of your predictions on 20 games. > >>PS: If the newer CM8000 of the King Program version 3.0 doesn't improve by much >>then the capability of testing different Winboard programs such as Crafty 17.12 >>and other by November will give CM8000 quite a challenge. I hope that by >>November CM8000 has a better Chess Opening than the current. > >Crafty is already challenging to the professional engines. The SSDF estimates >show crafty to be performing very well. Did you realized that I was referring to a probability of Crafty 17.12 being able to beat the future CM8000. Even if you test Crafty 17.11 vs CM6000 with SS set to 10 as the SS10 Personality Settingss or even my own CMKing Settings, it is very hard for crafty 17.11 to beat either of these Personalities with an identical AMD 450 Mhz. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.