Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 16:42:25 07/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 25, 2000 at 19:34:44, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 25, 2000 at 19:30:28, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >[snip] >>If my evaluation function gave positive scores to winning positions, it would >>win all of its games, period. If the positive scores were random, it would >>probably win in stupid ways, but it would still win. > >I think this is back to square one. >This assumes that we have perfect knowlege so we *really* know that a winning >move is a winning move. We don't really know that. Also, from any given Right. I'm just talking about making an evaluation function that correlates well with GM analysis/play. Surely there's no harm in that? I really doubt that you would end up with a function that says +5 when Rebel says -300 or something drastic like that. And if you do, who knows, maybe Rebel is way wrong. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.