Author: leonid
Date: 15:22:47 07/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 2000 at 17:26:01, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On July 26, 2000 at 16:59:35, leonid wrote: > >>On July 26, 2000 at 13:40:32, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>On July 26, 2000 at 09:18:41, leonid wrote: >>> >>>>Hi! >>>> >>>>How ask Fritz execute brute force search? I have Fritz 6 but if it is possible >>>>for some other version (even better DOS version), please say me. >>>> >>>>Recently I went to see Fritz nodes per second performance. Very impressive! Only >>>>maybe I am missing exact numbers. NPS tend to grow when search is done by brute >>>>force. This is why I try to find where Fritz numbers stays in real. But Fritz, >>>>in dispite of its performance, is not exactly open minded piece of software. >>>>Even its NPS I was able to see only through my Hiarcs 7.32 program. >>>> >>>>Thanks in advance, >>>>Leonid. >>> >>>My search is selective only because of null-move. I believe this is also the >>>case with Fritz. >>> >>>With null move on, my program searches 634k NPS. (BK, short searches) >> >> >>On what hardware do you have 634k? I was very impressed with Fritz numbers only >>because they were between 220 and 320k on AMD 400Mhz. Your numbers are almost >>twice as fast. > >Pentium III/800. On a K-6/400 I figure I'd get 350k NPS or so. And that's for BK >positions; if I did a 5 second run of WAC, I'd get 780k NPS or so. > >-Tom If I am not missing there something, your numbers are better that the Fritz have. If you could someday check at what speed Fritz 6 goes on your hardware and send me the numbers (best with some concret position), it will be very nice. Or just put them here. If you numbers are so good, like I see them, you should be really proud to say them in public. Leonid.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.