Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Tiger against Deep Blue Junior: what really happened.

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 15:35:57 07/26/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 26, 2000 at 18:04:58, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>>"At 2 to 2.5 million chess positions per second, one chess chip is equivalent >If you take 2 to 2.5 (actually 2 to 2.4 according to Hsu's numbers) and

Ah, I see. Hsu was trying to fake out IEEE.

>>So who is manufacturing data? It sure doesn't look like Chris.
>Does it look like me?  is 480 * 2.2M pretty close to 1B (remember that I

Yes, it does look like you. You are going through amazing contortions to
fabricate a number that's directly contradicted by _everything_. You're the hero
of "evidence" and "academia" yet you prefer some stupid multiplication problem
to data that was published by the creators of the machine itself. Hopefully you
have more integrity when you're doing research.

>said this was the theoretical _peak_ NPS for DB.  PEAK.  Not typical.  I

Your multiplication problem assumes that all of the processors are active and
every single one is crunching a position that allows absolute maximum
throughput. How many times do you think this has happened? I'm willing to bet
"never." I'm much more willing to believe a PEAK rate of 555M NPS, which has
actually been published somewhere. (IEEE)

>>Remember not long ago when I was quoting Hsu's estimate of how many general
>>purpose instructions it would take to search a DB node? And you told me that Hsu
>>obviously didn't know what he was talking about and the estimate was worthless?
>>Well, the estimate was published in the IEEE journal by the man who built the
>>chip. It was staring you right in the face, and against all common sense you
>>chose to ignore it. So who is being academic here? It doesn't look like you.
>I said that it is very hard to decide how many GP instructions it would take
>to emulate the DB hardware.  As the GP instruction set for the pentiums has
>changed significantly...

Right, you said that it was very hard and that Hsu was wrong. It was a pretty
slick job of contradicting evidence.

-Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.