Author: leonid
Date: 18:16:53 07/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 2000 at 20:45:42, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On July 26, 2000 at 19:26:03, leonid wrote: > >>On July 26, 2000 at 18:42:19, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>On July 26, 2000 at 18:22:47, leonid wrote: >>> >>>>On July 26, 2000 at 17:26:01, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 26, 2000 at 16:59:35, leonid wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On July 26, 2000 at 13:40:32, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On July 26, 2000 at 09:18:41, leonid wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Hi! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>How ask Fritz execute brute force search? I have Fritz 6 but if it is possible >>>>>>>>for some other version (even better DOS version), please say me. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Recently I went to see Fritz nodes per second performance. Very impressive! Only >>>>>>>>maybe I am missing exact numbers. NPS tend to grow when search is done by brute >>>>>>>>force. This is why I try to find where Fritz numbers stays in real. But Fritz, >>>>>>>>in dispite of its performance, is not exactly open minded piece of software. >>>>>>>>Even its NPS I was able to see only through my Hiarcs 7.32 program. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Thanks in advance, >>>>>>>>Leonid. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>My search is selective only because of null-move. I believe this is also the >>>>>>>case with Fritz. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>With null move on, my program searches 634k NPS. (BK, short searches) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>On what hardware do you have 634k? I was very impressed with Fritz numbers only >>>>>>because they were between 220 and 320k on AMD 400Mhz. Your numbers are almost >>>>>>twice as fast. >>>>> >>>>>Pentium III/800. On a K-6/400 I figure I'd get 350k NPS or so. And that's for BK >>>>>positions; if I did a 5 second run of WAC, I'd get 780k NPS or so. >>>>> >>>>>-Tom >>>> >>>>If I am not missing there something, your numbers are better that the Fritz >>>>have. If you could someday check at what speed Fritz 6 goes on your hardware and >>>>send me the numbers (best with some concret position), it will be very nice. Or >>>>just put them here. If you numbers are so good, like I see them, you should be >>>>really proud to say them in public. >>>> >>>>Leonid. >>> >>>Sure, I'm proud of the NPS, but at the moment my evaluation function is so weak >>>that the program isn't competitive with even the stronger amateur programs. >>> >>>-Tom >> >>Tom, anyway, if you will find few moments, send me, at least, one concret >>position with Fritz 6 NPS and yours. It will say me what exactly are those >>numbers. Your sound to me too enigmatic, since they are so good. And if you have >>them right now, rest is nothing but question of time. >> >>Leonid. > >I don't own Fritz 6, or any other chess program for that matter. > >I write my own; why should I want anybody else's? ;) > >-Tom To compare. To verify your code as well. Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.