Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:47:18 07/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 26, 2000 at 21:26:09, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >On July 26, 2000 at 15:27:36, Chris Carson wrote: > >>Just goes to show how much better the micro eval and search >>algorithms are. :) TPR's speak for them selves. 96 DB >>has fallen. :) >>Oh, try not to get to mad, but what position did HSU use to get >>the NPS number, not that it matters for actual performance (we have >>the TPR for that), but I would like to know? > >As I've tried to point out several times before, TPR != absolute strength. >Until you can get <insert program name here> to actually play against Kasparov >in a match and get an equivalent TPR _against him_, or can get DB to play >against the same players from which ProgramX has gotten its TPR, so that a real, >meaningful, comparison can be made, a TPR really means nothing. > >As for the position Hsu used for DB's NPS, it was just the average - the >approximate number seen at all positions. The math has been shown for this many >times also... And you don't ask what position DJ got 2.5m NPS in? :) Do you ever think this might be problem of "circumlocution"? :)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.