Author: Pete R.
Date: 10:31:35 07/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2000 at 13:05:05, blass uri wrote: >On July 27, 2000 at 12:15:15, Pete R. wrote: > >>On July 27, 2000 at 01:22:58, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On July 26, 2000 at 19:59:43, Pete R. wrote: >>> >>>>On July 26, 2000 at 14:08:22, Côme wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Hello there are 12 new interesting positions for chess programs !! >>>>> >>>>>r1b2rk1/p6p/1p4q1/2pP1p2/2Q2B1p/5RbP/P1B3P1/1R4K1 w - - bm Rxg3!; >>>> >>>>It would be much better to have PVs along with the best moves for position >>>>analysis. For example I don't see why Rxg3 is any better than Bxg3. Neither >>>>does Fritz, but I will let it run tonight. >>> >>>Just make the PVs yourself by pursuing each variation separately, that is going >>>with the moves Fritz selects after something like 5-10 minutes. I tried to do >>>that for a while with Yace and after Rxg3 hxg3 Rb3 Qf6 Rxg3+ Kf7 things are >>>beginning to look brighter for white. It would be interesting to pursue the Bxg3 >>>hxg3 line as well. Some lines may be too deep for direct calculation. >>> >>>Best wishes... >>>Mogens >> >>I normally do, and in this case I found nothing dramatic to show that Rxg3 >>deserves a !. That's why these things should come with a PV, to save everyone >>from the work! I let Fritz 6a run overnight on this and it still sees nothing >>special: > >After 1.Rxg3 hxg3 2.Rb3 >white has an attack against the black king. >I did not analyze if the attack is strong enough to win but I think it is >better to start to analyze after these moves. > >Uri I did, I could not find anything significantly better than the Bxg3 lines yet.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.