Author: Harald Faber
Date: 21:21:38 07/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 27, 2000 at 18:07:39, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 27, 2000 at 18:04:13, robert blackwell wrote: > >>Wow did i ever get a shock today! i played three games between rebel 10 and >>junior 6A. Before i started the match i thought that Junior would crush rebel. >>The times i chose were active 30 mins each, each computer on a amd k62 500. Well >>did i get a shock when in the first game rebel crushed junior with the white >>pieces in a nice kingside attack. The second game junior with the white pieces >>won a pawn out of the opening with some very good tactics, but then again rebel >>held on and turned the tables to a completely winning endgame. I do realise that >>after many games the score will go up and down, but i am just stating that i am >>shocked at rebels mature human like play. I also think that the longer the time >>control the better rebel would fair. I will post the games if anyone wants so >>that you folks can view them. :) congrats to ed! > >While I don't doubt your results at all, and I love the Rebel program, 3 games >are not enough to come to any sensible conclusion about strength. Except you are Thorsten Czub, then even ONE game is enough. =:-))) (SCNR)
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.