Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 09:58:22 07/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 12:51:24, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 28, 2000 at 10:33:03, Bertil Eklund wrote: > >>I guess you know Thorsten quite well.... > >Yes, I was looking carefully to see if the word beancounter appeared anywhere >among the bit nonsense. Is it better to be a beancounter than a bitcounter? A >though question to answer. Considering that the bitapproach resembles absolute >rubbish, I'll stick to my beancounting methods. > >Best wishes... >Mogens Hmmm, I liked his post quite a bit (no pun intended) :). Why do you think it's "nonsense"? --Peter
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.