Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 10:27:11 07/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 12:58:22, Peter Kappler wrote: >Hmmm, I liked his post quite a bit (no pun intended) :). Why do you think it's >"nonsense"? You're were probably seduced by the eloquent defence of bits and pieces :o). The last paragraph is the nonsense part (and most of the first), because it's almost purely subjective analysis. I've had a similar discussion with Thorsten and it invariably ends up with the "I feel or sense which program is stronger"-argument. Someone else will observe something different and so the story goes. It can be used in conjunction with empirical data, but it can't stand alone. Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.