Author: blass uri
Date: 12:58:53 07/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 15:33:47, Dann Corbit wrote: <snipped> > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > > 1 LarsenVB : 2610 186 226 12 79.2 % 2378 25.0 % > 2 Storm : 2557 223 166 12 58.3 % 2498 33.3 % > 3 Noonian : 2546 232 144 12 54.2 % 2517 41.7 % > 4 Ozwald : 2542 166 223 12 41.7 % 2601 33.3 % > 5 Monik : 2363 214 247 12 62.5 % 2274 8.3 % > 6 Zephyr : 2317 215 215 12 50.0 % 2317 16.7 % > 7 TSCP : 2293 180 402 12 83.3 % 2013 0.0 % > 8 SnailSCP : 2185 214 194 12 62.5 % 2096 25.0 % > 9 Raffaela : 1893 297 170 12 8.3 % 2310 16.7 % > 10 Golem01 : 1695 0 0 12 0.0 % 2295 0.0 % The elo is simply wrong. The right way to calculate elo based on tournament is simply to assume that the tournament happen again and again and calculate the limit of the elo rating for every program when the number of games get closer to infinite(you should not include programs that has 0% or 100%). In this case you should not count Golem01 because the elo of this program will always go down(the expected result of golem is more than 0% even if there is a difference of 1000000 elo). TSCP also deserves at least the same rating as Monik because TSCP got 50% against Monik and 100% against other players so the rating of TSCP should always improve when it is behind Monik when the results repeat again. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.