Author: Pete Galati
Date: 15:47:10 07/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 16:51:31, Masciulli Gianluigi wrote: > > >>Gianluigi's searches probably list the scores, but they're not marked, but I >>assume it's the number that's right after the search depth, if that's true, > >right! is the second number in the line (not my idea but the winboard standard!! >they are in centipawn so golem thinks the games are equal. >(rimember golem allways say +white is good -black is good ... >not the usual egocentric +is good for me :-) > >>then >>Golem says 4 and 2, but it way too early in the game for that to mean anything, >>even if I did guess the right score numbers. > >right again... sherlock :-) > >ciao >gianluigi > >ps. what you are thinking about the games so far? >i'll think about it and i will post it tomorrow. I'm not sure what to think actually. These openings that they're making up are not like openings I play. This is actually the first time I've looked at them in progress. I'm anxious to see them get to the endgame. Pete [Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2000.07.28"] [Round "1"] [White "Golem"] [WhiteElo ""] [Black "Nero"] [BlackElo ""] [Result "*"] 1. Nf3 d5 2. e3 Nc6 3. Be2 e5 4. O-O Bd7 5. d4 * [D]r2qkbnr/pppb1ppp/2n5/3pp3/3P4/4PN2/PPP1BPPP/RNBQ1RK1 b kq d3 0 5 [Event "?"] [Site "?"] [Date "2000.07.28"] [Round "2"] [White "Nero"] [WhiteElo ""] [Black "Golem"] [BlackElo ""] [Result "*"] 1. d4 d5 2. Bf4 e6 3. Nc3 g5 4. Be5 f6 * [D]rnbqkbnr/ppp4p/4pp2/3pB1p1/3P4/2N5/PPP1PPPP/R2QKBNR w KQkq - 0 5
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.