Author: Pete Galati
Date: 15:48:48 07/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 18:47:10, Pete Galati wrote: >On July 28, 2000 at 16:51:31, Masciulli Gianluigi wrote: > >> >> >>>Gianluigi's searches probably list the scores, but they're not marked, but I >>>assume it's the number that's right after the search depth, if that's true, >> >>right! is the second number in the line (not my idea but the winboard standard!! >>they are in centipawn so golem thinks the games are equal. >>(rimember golem allways say +white is good -black is good ... >>not the usual egocentric +is good for me :-) >> >>>then >>>Golem says 4 and 2, but it way too early in the game for that to mean anything, >>>even if I did guess the right score numbers. >> >>right again... sherlock :-) >> >>ciao >>gianluigi >> >>ps. what you are thinking about the games so far? >>i'll think about it and i will post it tomorrow. > >I'm not sure what to think actually. These openings that they're making up are >not like openings I play. This is actually the first time I've looked at them >in progress. I'm anxious to see them get to the endgame. I meant to say midgame. > >Pete > >[Event "?"] >[Site "?"] >[Date "2000.07.28"] >[Round "1"] >[White "Golem"] >[WhiteElo ""] >[Black "Nero"] >[BlackElo ""] >[Result "*"] > >1. Nf3 d5 2. e3 Nc6 3. Be2 e5 4. O-O Bd7 5. d4 * >[D]r2qkbnr/pppb1ppp/2n5/3pp3/3P4/4PN2/PPP1BPPP/RNBQ1RK1 b kq d3 0 5 > >[Event "?"] >[Site "?"] >[Date "2000.07.28"] >[Round "2"] >[White "Nero"] >[WhiteElo ""] >[Black "Golem"] >[BlackElo ""] >[Result "*"] > >1. d4 d5 2. Bf4 e6 3. Nc3 g5 4. Be5 f6 * >[D]rnbqkbnr/ppp4p/4pp2/3pB1p1/3P4/2N5/PPP1PPPP/R2QKBNR w KQkq - 0 5
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.