Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 21:17:54 07/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 13:40:57, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On July 28, 2000 at 13:31:02, Pete R. wrote: > >>On July 28, 2000 at 13:08:38, Côme wrote: >> >>> >>>Hello, >>>I will may be post a lot more new interesting positions for chessprograms but >>>please stop asking the pv!! If you don't see why the move is the best may be >>>you can search for yourself ? >> >>And if you're so strong that you can see it in two seconds, why not post it? >>The point is you are not telling us where these positions are from. Are they >>from GM games? > >Yes, all of them. > >> Which games? > >Games included in TWIC. > >> E.g. the Nolot test positions show which game the >>position is from. It's good to be able to verify the move without spending a >>lot of time trying to figure out if the move is really best. Test suite >>positions do contain mistakes. If you don't want to go to the extra effort to >>give more information, that's up to you of course. I would do it as a courtesy, >>but it's a personal choice. > >I disagree. I think it's already more than courtesy to find these positions and >post them here. And I personally have more fun trying to find the lines myself. > >Merci beaucoup, monsieur Côme. :) > >Enrique Following your reasoning I think that, at least for courtesy, players' names should be placed. I also have more fun trying to found the lines, but I think interesting that the pv is placed, because it's always impossible to found the correct line. Paulo Soares, from Brazil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.