Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:08:02 07/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2000 at 15:26:44, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >On July 29, 2000 at 11:05:33, Chessfun wrote: > >>On July 29, 2000 at 11:02:43, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >> >>>On July 29, 2000 at 09:11:35, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>On July 29, 2000 at 09:08:47, Harald Faber wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 29, 2000 at 06:40:24, blass uri wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I read at http://mitglied.tripod.de/ChessBits/index.html that an experiment >>>>>>version of a well known program is 120 elo above shredder4 but they did not say >>>>>>which version. >>>>>> >>>>>>When I clicked on the rating list I found that Fritz6a and Deep Junior are >>>>>>numebr 1 and there is no experimental version in the rating list. >>>>>> >>>>>>Uri >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>I'd guess it is Hiarcs 8. >>>> >>>> >>>>... or Shredder 5... >>> >>>I would bet my money on Deep Fritz, the SMP version of Fritz 6a which is >>>supposed to be a killer. Or even Deep Junior 6 which could easily be 120 ELO >> >> >>Deep Junior 6 is listed in 2nd. How they are testing single or dual cpu is my >>question. Same thing if it is F6SMP. >> >>Thanks. >> >> >> >>>higher than Shredder 4... Still, my guess is Deep Fritz. >>> >>>*** Djordje > >I do understand your methodological concern, but pray tell me which other >program (apart from a SMP version of Fritz or DJ) could be 120 pts above >Shredder 4? Hiarcs 8, Fritz 7, Shredder 5 or maybe an upgrade for Deep Junior 6. >I believe that Chessbits have been doing this testing merely to >experiment, and that's why they haven't released official data. As the SMP >version of a program is supposed to be about 1.5-1.7 (depending on the efficacy >of the implementation), that would put the actual ELO margin at about 70. That also assumes they are testing on a dual cpu, which if that is the case then the single cpu programs are at a speed disadvantage. >Thank _you_ for discussing the matter provokingly. I still think that we would >have made a couple of lousy sleuths :-) All I said was it wasn't Deep Junior 6 as that was in 2nd. And I was interested in knowing how they tested the dual cpu Deep Junior, not sure that is provoking. But you are right about the sleuth part. Thanks. >*** Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.