Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 16:55:39 07/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2000 at 13:44:28, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>On July 29, 2000 at 00:17:54, Paulo Soares wrote:
>
>>On July 28, 2000 at 13:40:57, Enrique Irazoqui wrote:
>>
>>>On July 28, 2000 at 13:31:02, Pete R. wrote:
>>>
>>>>On July 28, 2000 at 13:08:38, Côme wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Hello,
>>>>>I will may be post a lot more new interesting positions for chessprograms but
>>>>>please stop asking the pv!! If you don't see why the move is the best may be
>>>>>you can search for yourself ?
>>>>
>>>>And if you're so strong that you can see it in two seconds, why not post it?
>>>>The point is you are not telling us where these positions are from. Are they
>>>>from GM games?
>>>
>>>Yes, all of them.
>>>
>>>> Which games?
>>>
>>>Games included in TWIC.
>>>
>>>> E.g. the Nolot test positions show which game the
>>>>position is from. It's good to be able to verify the move without spending a
>>>>lot of time trying to figure out if the move is really best. Test suite
>>>>positions do contain mistakes. If you don't want to go to the extra effort to
>>>>give more information, that's up to you of course. I would do it as a courtesy,
>>>>but it's a personal choice.
>>>
>>>I disagree. I think it's already more than courtesy to find these positions and
>>>post them here. And I personally have more fun trying to find the lines myself.
>>>
>>>Merci beaucoup, monsieur Côme. :)
>>>
>>>Enrique
>>
>>Following your reasoning I think that, at least for courtesy, players' names
>>should be placed. I also have more fun trying to found the lines, but I think
>>interesting that the pv is placed, because it's always impossible to found
>>the correct line.
>>
>>Paulo Soares, from Brazil
>
>I find this quite extraordinary. Someone finds interesting positions, shares
>them with us in here and then he is critizided ("at least for courtesy") for
>posting them his way and not yours.
>
>I'm sorry, Paulo, but this spoiled-brat attitude is rather discorteous. Would
>you prefer not to have these positions at all?
>
>Enrique
I am criticizing the way like you used the word " courtesy ", because the
larger merit belongs to the chess players that produced the positions.
Summarizing what happened:
1. Two chess players played one each other.
2. Twik placed the game in its home page.
3. Somebody sought (that person obviously has merits) and found an interesting
position in the game.
4. Another person thought the position should be placed with more data.
5. You didn't agree and thought was more than a courtesy has sought the
positions.
Fictitious:
_Well, I am one of the chess players and I found a disrespect that my name has
not been placed together with the position._
Enrique, I think the positions have to be placed with the largest possible
number of data, because we have to have a organized database for future
consultations and change of ideas. It would be also very good that the
programmers, mainly, had the pv.
Just what I think, if people don't agree with me, please continue placing
the positions, I won't stop analyzing a position if I don't have all data.
Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.