Author: stuart taylor
Date: 21:07:23 07/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 29, 2000 at 23:51:11, ujecrh wrote:>> in fact I remember that Richard Lang's programs were criticized because >they were too passive so the author changed that in version 4 to have a more >active game. > >Not everybody is fool and many people here still consider Genius as one of the >very best engine. > >Ujecrh I'm speaking about Genius 3 in particular, which is tested on chessbits now as being stronger even than Genius 6.5. And, wasn't Genius 3 much more active than Genius 2? And it was very great both against human AND machines? S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.