Author: blass uri
Date: 05:32:25 07/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 30, 2000 at 07:34:02, Terry Ripple wrote: >On July 29, 2000 at 10:48:35, Chessfun wrote: > >>On July 29, 2000 at 10:12:48, Albert Silver wrote: >> >>>On July 29, 2000 at 03:50:59, Terry Ripple wrote: >>> >>>>On July 28, 2000 at 15:45:15, Christophe Theron wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 28, 2000 at 01:05:53, Terry Ripple wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Used an AMD K6-2, 266Mhz, 64Ram, Ponder off, 16Mb Hash per engine. >>>>>> >>>>>>If anyone cares to see some or all of the games, i will be glad to post them. >>>>>> This match shows how close the strengths are between these two fine engines! >>>>>> >>>>>>Best regards, >>>>>>Terry >>>>>> >>>>>>Blitz:5' 2000 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>1 Fritz 6 158.0/306 >>>>>>2 Hiarcs 7.32 148.0/306 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>No offense intended Terry, but you cannot say with this match which program is >>>>>the best. >>>>> >>>>>The result of this match is 51.63% in favor of Fritz. >>>>> >>>>>I don't have the typical margin of error for 306 games, but I know that for 400 >>>>>games it is +/-2.5% (80% confidence) and +/-2.1% (70% confidence). >>>>> >>>>>So even if you got this 51.63% with a 400 games match, you couldn't say which >>>>>program won because 51.63% is between 47.5% and 52.5% (80% confidence). You >>>>>couldn't even say Fritz is better with 70% confidence. >>>>> >>>>>That's the problem with chess matches results... You have to apply some >>>>>statistic formulas and sometimes you discover that the match does not say which >>>>>is best... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Christophe >>>> >>>> Please explain where you may get a margin of error when there isn't a human >>>>operator making any moves on the chess board? Please, i would like to learn more >>>>about this! >>>> >>>>Regards, Terry >>> >>>The margin of error he is talking about isn't that of mistakes in the input of >>>the moves, but of statistical certainty of who the best is. With that many games >>>you can ascertain which is best but there is a margin of error, and that is the >>>margin of error he is talking about. Fritz may have won the match but in order >>>to say it is the best you either need to factor in the statistical margin of >>>error or play more games. >>> >>> Albert Silver >> >> >>I am not sure but 16 mb of hash sounds too much for a 5 min game. Anyway which >>version of Fritz is this. 6a?, light?, as originally I see Terry posting about >>Light. >> >>Thanks. > >Hi Chessfun, > The version that i'am using in this match of 306 games is still Fritz Light >which i was told is the identical Fritz 6 partner! It is not identical to Fritz6 but to Fritz6old that is the previous Fritz6 engine(not after the upgrade). People got the impression that there is no real difference between Fritz6 and Hiarcs7.32 based on your information. I tried to explain the result by the explanation that Hiarcs is better at blitz and I did not think that the real reason is that you use Fritz6light. I think that you should use the latest Fritz6 (otherwise you should use the name Fritz6old or Fritz6light). I guess that you will get better result for the real fritz6 after 306 games. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.