Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: here 's what i think about the games

Author: blass uri

Date: 06:47:18 07/30/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 30, 2000 at 08:53:30, Masciulli Gianluigi wrote:

>On July 30, 2000 at 06:00:55, Jari Huikari wrote:
>
>
>>Si. Now it seems that there is no good castle left for his king.
>
>too bad :-(
>
>>
>>
>>Add some bonuses(/penalties) for good(/bad) moves in opening.
>
>not so simple ...
>You know that golem has no evaluation function ... so I "simply" must add
>that evaluation function.
>Now Golem has only 2 factor
>1)material
>2)centralization bonus

Can golem see mate in 1?

This position is from the caliberation games(20.6.2000).
[D]1k6/5q2/3K4/8/3bp3/5r2/8/8 b - - 0 1

Golem played Rc3 with stalemate instead of Rf6 with checkmate but for some
reason the result is 0-1(white lost on time) and not 1/2-1/2 and I do not
understand it because if the position in the board is stalemate then it is a
draw.

I also think from looking at the game that golem does not know about material
and it could get a winning position only because the opponent(storm) also did
not know much about material.

Here is the opening.

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d5 3.exd5 Qxd5 4.d4 Nc6 5.c3 Qd6 6.Nb5 Qe6+??(I expect a program
that know only about material to see that Qe6 is wrong) 7.Ne5 Nxe5?
8.Nc7+ Kd7 9.Bd3???????????????????

The main blunder of golem:

[D]r1b1kbnr/pp2pppp/2nq4/1Np5/3P4/5N2/PPP2PPP/R1BQKB1R b KQkq - 0 1

Golem blundered with Qe6+


Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.