Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Genius 3, still amongst the tops!!!

Author: ujecrh

Date: 15:38:14 07/31/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 30, 2000 at 08:20:11, blass uri wrote:
>
>Only anand could stop it.
>I do not know about the games against Vaisser.

It was I think at Aubervillier tournament but I do not quite remember the year.

>
>I did not buy later version of Genius3 because I did not hear about significant
>improvements.

That's true and it is a shame because the Genius serie was a very good one.

>
>>But it does not really matter.
>>
>>>Genius3(p90) won kasparov 1.5:.5 in game/25(kasparov did not know that he plays
>>>against a new version and thought that he was playing against Genius2)
>>>
>>
>>Genius 3 was not released. It happened in fact at the intel PCA in London
>>*before* G3 was released (it was named in my local chess magazine Genius 2.9!)
>
>I have Genius3 and it has the database of the games and they called it
>ChessGenius3 in the database and not Genius2.9.

That was an intermediate version prior to Genius 3, for example look at the
following article, they even call it genius 2 :
http://www.chessandcheckers.com/clips.htm

Anyway, as we already mentionned there is probably not a huge difference (apart
from the playing style) between G2 and G6.x

>
>>but I agree that it was probably almost the same as the commercial engine that
>>followed, the win over Kasparov was the ideal advertisement.
>>
>>>In another match later kasparov won Genius3(p120) 1.5:.5
>>
>>Exactly. Once well known, genius 3 became a rather easy target for GMs patially
>>because of its conservative style.
>
>losing 1.5:.5 against kasparov with p120 is not easy.
>kasparov was afraid of losing in the first game because Genius3 had a better
>position in the first game inspite of the fact that kasparov could prepare for
>the match.
>
>I think that genius3 lost the game because of some tactical bug that does not
>happen often to it(I analyzed the game with Genius3 and I remember that in this
>game the evaluation of Genius proved that it could not see some tactics that
>should be simple for computers but unfortunately I do not remember the game and
>do not have it near me).
>
>I also remember that I read that Genius3 got a good result against humans
>including a win against nunn.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.