Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz6Light-Hiarcs7.32 blitz match - My comparison of 306 games

Author: blass uri

Date: 22:50:08 07/31/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 01, 2000 at 00:47:41, Terry Ripple wrote:

>On July 31, 2000 at 13:15:33, blass uri wrote:
>
>>On July 31, 2000 at 12:56:02, blass uri wrote:
>><snipped>
>>>The result after 48 games including all the 1.a3 opening is 24-24
>>>(The last opening was 1.a4 b5)
>>
>>I see that I was wrong in calculating the result and it was 25-23 and now after
>>50 games it is 27-23 but it is still not significant.
>>
>>I added the result in the first 20 games 10.5-9.5 for fritz6light with the
>>result in the next 28 games and 14.5-13.5 for fritz6light and I remmebered one
>>of the results wrong.
>>
>>27-23 that is still not significant.
>>
>>I guess that I am going to do about 20 games every day because my pIII450 is not
>>used most of the time for chess.
>>
>>Uri
>
>Hi Uri,
>  As you can see from my 306 games that we have similar results! I used 16Mb
>Hash for each engine and this didn't appear to be too much for Fritz Light or
>not enough for Hiarcs 7.32. I used an AMD 266Mhz MMX, 64Ram, Ponder Off! It will
>be most interesting to see your scores as more games are played. As you can see,
>my final score was only a difference of 10 games in favor of Fritz 6 Light.
>  This match was a 5 min. blitz (5min.per side/game) Is your match the same time
>
>Regards,Terry-

Yes my match is 5 minutes blitz but I use pentiumIII450(256 Ram) that is faster.

The result after 60 games is 30-30

Fritz6light lost one game on time after 140 moves but the position was also bad
for it(rook and 2 pawns for hiarcs against rook so I do not think that too much
hash tables was the problem of Fritz6light).

I believe that 16 mbytes are too much for Fritz6light in your hardware and I
suspect that it lost few games on time(also in less than 140 moves but only you
can check if I am right)

I also believe that 16 mbytes is not enough for hiarcs7.32 and it could play
better with bigger hash tables.

I believe in it based on James walker previous results(I remember that James
walker found that bigger hash tables helped Hiarcs7.32 in a blitz match against
Fritz5.32).

I expect my match to take a long time because it has 800 games and I use my
pentiumIII450 only some hours in a day for the match.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.