Author: blass uri
Date: 13:38:58 08/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 01, 2000 at 14:48:31, Terry Ripple wrote: >On August 01, 2000 at 07:49:49, blass uri wrote: > >>Fritz6light lost the second game on time in this match at move 121. >>This time Hiarcs had not a winning position but a drawn position(KR vs KB). >> >>Hiarcs7.32 is using 128 Mbytes hash tables >>Fritz6Light is using 8 mbytes hash tables >> >>Hardware one pIII450 >> >>position played. >> >>1.a3 and all the legal moves for black(total 20 positions) result 20-20 >>1.a4 (total 20 positions) result 24-16 for Hiarcs >> >>Uri > >Hi again Uri, > I would be interested to see how many games Fritz6 Light loses on time in your >tournament, as you now know that in my tournament that totaled 306 games that >Fritz6 Light lost 3.92% of the games (12 games). You believe in my tournament >why Fritz6 Light lost on time was because my Hash tables(16mb)were a little high >for my AMD 266Mhz with 64 Ram. I'll be re-checking this and possibly make some >adjustments for the future matches! > >In your matches do you adjust the Pondering on or off? I have Pondering off! > >Regards,Terry I did tell the computer nothing about pondering but I know from my experience that the pondering is always off when I play comp-comp(othewise I could see a drop in the number of nodes per seconds relative to regular games and I know that from my experience in longer time control that I do not see it). I also think that it is impossible to play with ponder on with hiarcs7.32 interface when I use only one processor(I read that it is possible with Fritz6 interface but I do not use Fritz6 interface). The result after 100 games is 53-47 for Hiarcs7.32(Fritz6Light lost exactly 2 games on times when one of them was in a draw position KR vs KB and another one was in KRPP vs KR that Hiarcs can probably win). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.