Author: Mark Young
Date: 02:13:26 08/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2000 at 02:30:52, Pete Galati wrote: >On August 04, 2000 at 01:27:12, blass uri wrote: > >>On August 04, 2000 at 01:12:21, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>NO! >> >>I read that Ed tried to translate his assembler DOS code to C in order to do it >>a windows program and the result was that the program was 30% slower. >> >>Maybe it is possible to give the customer the option to choose between Dos and >>windows when it will be clear that the windows version is significantly slower. >> >>Uri > >Besides, Dos is the best thing Microsoft ever had going. The farther they get >from Dos the crappier their OS gets. And the fact that Windows 98 is allot more >stable than Windows 95 doesn't say much because Dos is far more stable than >either one. > >I'd rather see Ed's company stay with Dos, but I don't have the popular opinion. I for one have never had a problem with windows 98, and would like to see Rebel move away from dos. If Rebel is dos, I will be in no rush to buy it. I really enjoy playing chess in the ChessBase GUI. And will not like stepping backwards into the bad graphics of a dos GUI. > >Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.