Author: Harald Faber
Date: 08:14:47 08/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2000 at 09:37:50, blass uri wrote: >On August 04, 2000 at 09:19:46, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On August 04, 2000 at 06:35:53, Peter Ackermann wrote: >> >>>On August 04, 2000 at 03:35:55, Terry Ripple wrote: >>> >>>>I have Hiarcs7.32 and we all know how many faults that it has >> >>What faults does Hiarcs have? I think it is pretty stable, and very strong... I >>can't really see a flaw... > >I do not use hiarcs's book but I remember that Mark young found that the book of >Hiarcs7.32 is not good and prefered to use a book based on Junior5's book+some >GM's games. > >He said that the book of the DOS version of hiarcs was better. > >Uri There is a newer Hiarcs tree (newer than the one coming on CD) which is said to contain the DOS-book. There is advice to add that to the general.ctg. Does Mark refer to this "new" book or the old one? If to the new one I would really like to see at least a handful of buggy lines.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.