Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is this how Alpha-Beta results should look ?

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 10:43:04 08/04/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 04, 2000 at 02:01:16, Larry Griffiths wrote:

>On August 04, 2000 at 00:43:29, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>
>>On August 03, 2000 at 22:41:52, Larry Griffiths wrote:
>>
>>>On August 03, 2000 at 21:53:15, Tom Kerrigan wrote:
>>>
>Elapsed Time= 272.73 seconds
>
>  1             0              20              20             0
>  2             0              45              45             0
>  3             2             615             617             0
>  4            36           1,315           1,351             0
>  5           225          21,401          21,626             2
>  6         6,073          47,181          53,254            50
>  7        32,028       1,004,413       1,036,441         1,407
>  8       624,463       2,663,277       3,287,740        11,373
>  9     4,461,279      58,250,653      62,711,932       836,292
> 10    73,160,952      88,774,702     161,935,654    15,731,882
>    _____________ _______________ _______________ _____________
>       78,285,058     150,763,622     229,048,680    16,581,006
>
>        Captures/Moves Per Second=        839,824
>
>Heres what it looks like with material values, YUK!
>
>I downloaded TSCP from your web site.
>
>It says version 1.6 dated 7/17/2000.
>
>Is this the version you used to produce the results?

No, I used my good program. (Stobor)

>
>Your branching factor between the plys are so even.
>
>Are you doing interitive searchs for each ply?

I don't do internal iterative deepening. But I do a quiescence search, which may
be helping somewhat.

-Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.