Author: leonid
Date: 16:07:11 08/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 04, 2000 at 14:22:09, Andrew Dados wrote: Thanks for response! It make me laugh a good moment. "Nomenclature" is funny word. > >leonid others >-------------------------------- >root leaves >2 plys special search futility pruning (?) Not sure about this. If every search start with ply zero and goes x plys deep, in my program I have in total 6 special plys. Two are just zero and one. I think it have nothing to do with futility pruning. And between the other four, the most different are two next plys that stays just at the bottom of all pile of plys. If beyond those two next plys (above of bottom two plys) all other are not written in the same way it is only because this different writing don't bring any additional speeding to the program as a whole. >tactics code quiescence search It could be that quiescence search is the part of tactics. Tactics for me is the part of program that help when brute force search give no final response. This happened just too often. >mini-max (hard to say; not a mini-max for sure) Usual material search logic with move sorting and bounds removed. When every move in the ply is searched. >The above is just a guess, but somehow I have a feeling leonid is writing his >program in quite the same way as most of us... if only we could speak some >uniform language... Maybe. Leonid. >-Andrew-
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.