Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 07:11:05 08/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 03, 2000 at 21:53:15, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >Here's my output: > > 1 0.078 2 0.00 b1a3 > 1. 0.078 21 0.00 b1a3 > 2 0.078 43 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 > 2. 0.094 85 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 > 3 0.094 150 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 > 3. 0.094 615 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 > 4 0.094 1129 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 > 4. 0.094 1936 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 > 5 0.110 4290 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 > 5. 0.110 11334 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 > 6 0.125 19888 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 > 6. 0.157 34570 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 > 7 0.203 58783 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 > 7. 0.297 154233 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 > 8 0.453 281533 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 g8h6 > 8. 0.938 504702 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 g8h6 > 9 1.735 926376 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 g8h6 > g1h3 > 9. 3.016 2192164 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 g8h6 > g1h3 >10 5.625 4229084 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 g8h6 > g1h3 f7f5 >10. 13.235 7847438 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 g8h6 > g1h3 f7f5 >11 27.157 15284364 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 g8h6 > g1h3 f7f5 b1a1 >11. 47.610 34122580 0.00 b1a3 b8a6 a3b5 a6b8 b5d4 b8a6 a1b1 g8h6 > g1h3 f7f5 b1a1 > >It goes: ply, seconds, nodes, score, pv > >So nodes per second is 716710 on my Pentium III/800. > >(This is with material-only evaluation and no null moves.) > >-Tom I'd say that some static move-ordering is called for here. <grin> Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.