Author: blass uri
Date: 11:40:41 08/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2000 at 14:24:18, Peter Skinner wrote: >On August 07, 2000 at 13:13:23, blass uri wrote: > >>On August 07, 2000 at 12:44:29, Peter Skinner wrote: >> >>>On August 07, 2000 at 03:15:06, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>On August 07, 2000 at 01:35:22, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>> >>>>>According to latest SSDF list Goliath Light is stronger than Hiarcs7.32. >>>>>Congratulations to Michael. Hope, that Goliath also goes to London WC! >>>>> >>>>>Jouni >>>> >>>>according to the ssdf list we cannot know which program is better. >>>>1 elo difference is not significant. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>I fully agree. Also I se on the list that Fritz 5.32 is still rated higher than >>>Hiarcs... I simply can not see how, as everytime I have matched the 2 programs, >>>Hiarcs kills Fritz 5.32... Hiarcs always seems to win in the endgame... >> >>What is the time control of your match? >> >>Is it 2 hours/40 moves? >> >>Uri > >Yes, in the 2/40, Hiarcs beats Fritz 5.32 almost every game. Even in quicker >time controls, Hiarcs seems to best Fritz all the time. Rarely dropping a game. I am not surprised if it wins in quicker time control because hiarcs is known to be good at blitz(it never lose on time when Fritz5.32 can lose on time) My tests (not against Fritz5.32) showed that hiarcs has problems in retaining the hash tables at longer time control and it may do errors that it does not do if I give it to analyze positions with no learning. What is your hardware? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.