Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 12:36:17 08/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2000 at 14:40:41, blass uri wrote: >On August 07, 2000 at 14:24:18, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>On August 07, 2000 at 13:13:23, blass uri wrote: >> >>>On August 07, 2000 at 12:44:29, Peter Skinner wrote: >>> >>>>On August 07, 2000 at 03:15:06, blass uri wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 07, 2000 at 01:35:22, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>According to latest SSDF list Goliath Light is stronger than Hiarcs7.32. >>>>>>Congratulations to Michael. Hope, that Goliath also goes to London WC! >>>>>> >>>>>>Jouni >>>>> >>>>>according to the ssdf list we cannot know which program is better. >>>>>1 elo difference is not significant. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>I fully agree. Also I se on the list that Fritz 5.32 is still rated higher than >>>>Hiarcs... I simply can not see how, as everytime I have matched the 2 programs, >>>>Hiarcs kills Fritz 5.32... Hiarcs always seems to win in the endgame... >>> >>>What is the time control of your match? >>> >>>Is it 2 hours/40 moves? >>> >>>Uri >> >>Yes, in the 2/40, Hiarcs beats Fritz 5.32 almost every game. Even in quicker >>time controls, Hiarcs seems to best Fritz all the time. Rarely dropping a game. > >I am not surprised if it wins in quicker time control because hiarcs is known to >be good at blitz(it never lose on time when Fritz5.32 can lose on time) > >My tests (not against Fritz5.32) showed that hiarcs has problems in retaining >the hash tables at longer time control and it may do errors that it does not do >if I give it to analyze positions with no learning. > >What is your hardware? > >Uri What would happen if you turned the learning off for the long time controls, would this then help Hiarcs? Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.