Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: moderation

Author: Peter McKenzie

Date: 13:21:00 08/07/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 07, 2000 at 10:24:45, Andrew Dados wrote:

>On August 07, 2000 at 10:15:54, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>
>>On August 07, 2000 at 10:05:05, blass uri wrote:
>>
>>>I think that people should be allowed to discuss here in both cases.
>>
>>I agree.
>>
>>>I think 5 people is big enough to allow discussion about a subject.
>>
>>There's no lower limit regarding the number of participants or followers of a
>>thread. A single individual has equal rights to pursue a thread by himself or
>>herself, especially if the content is on-topic. Even off-topic threads by a
>>single person are alright IMO as long as the duration is clearly limited and the
>>content non-abusive.
>>
>>>I am not sure if there were more than 5 people who were interested in subjects
>>>that I posted(for example Repetition code for TSCP) and I was not asked to use
>>>email for this subject.
>>
>>Of course not, the subject was on-topic.
>>
>>Best wishes...
>>Mogens
>
>Um... what I saw was a small joke by Peter about 'you two'... noone else got it
>that way??

Well spotted, but unfortunately I can't claim to having such a clever sense of
humour!

Really, I was just asking Daniel & Jorge to be a bit more thoughtful about
posting a whole bunch of messages that add little to this message board.  I'm
not asking these guys to stop posting, and I'm not asking them to stop posting
about CM or CM books.  All I ask is please cut down on the sizeable number of
posts with very limited content.  Some of these threads are surely more suitable
for email, and others could easily be batched into a single large post.



>
>cheers
>-Andrew-



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.