Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 14:59:41 08/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 07, 2000 at 16:21:00, Peter McKenzie wrote: >On August 07, 2000 at 10:24:45, Andrew Dados wrote: > >>On August 07, 2000 at 10:15:54, Mogens Larsen wrote: >> >>>On August 07, 2000 at 10:05:05, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>I think that people should be allowed to discuss here in both cases. >>> >>>I agree. >>> >>>>I think 5 people is big enough to allow discussion about a subject. >>> >>>There's no lower limit regarding the number of participants or followers of a >>>thread. A single individual has equal rights to pursue a thread by himself or >>>herself, especially if the content is on-topic. Even off-topic threads by a >>>single person are alright IMO as long as the duration is clearly limited and the >>>content non-abusive. >>> >>>>I am not sure if there were more than 5 people who were interested in subjects >>>>that I posted(for example Repetition code for TSCP) and I was not asked to use >>>>email for this subject. >>> >>>Of course not, the subject was on-topic. >>> >>>Best wishes... >>>Mogens >> >>Um... what I saw was a small joke by Peter about 'you two'... noone else got it >>that way?? > >Well spotted, but unfortunately I can't claim to having such a clever sense of >humour! > >Really, I was just asking Daniel & Jorge to be a bit more thoughtful about >posting a whole bunch of messages that add little to this message board. I'm >not asking these guys to stop posting, and I'm not asking them to stop posting >about CM or CM books. All I ask is please cut down on the sizeable number of >posts with very limited content. Some of these threads are surely more suitable >for email, and others could easily be batched into a single large post. > > > >> >>cheers >>-Andrew- That is a sensible statement said in that way. I have no problems with it Regards /wayne
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.