Author: Alexander Kure
Date: 06:20:08 08/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 08, 2000 at 06:00:32, blass uri wrote: >On August 08, 2000 at 05:07:38, Alexander Kure wrote: > >>On August 07, 2000 at 23:20:58, Peter Skinner wrote: >> >>>Yes WBNimzo 2000b is stronger than the Nimzo 99 engine, and the 2000 "native" >>>engine. It however is a bit weaker than the 7.32 version, but using Winboard >>>makes up for the short fall. >>> >>>The only thing I wiah is that there was a better book for it. >> >>Funny! I supposed that Nimzo's book is good enough ;-) Or to state it >>differently: There is no better book than the Nimzo book ;-) >>If you want to add more variety simply set RandomBook=1. >> >>Greetings >>Alex > >I have no idea which book is the best because I do not know about serious test >of nimzo's book against other books. > >It is possible to do a tournament between engines when >every engine from group A use Nimzo's book and every engine from group B use >Fritz's book. > >After it do the same tournament when every engine from group A use Fritz's book >and every engine from group B use Nimzo's book. > >If nimzo's book has a total score of more than 50% in both tournaments it >suggests that Nimzo's book is better than Fritz's book. > >I have no information about the question which book is better except some >information that suggest that Fritz6's book is better than Junior6's book based >on chessfun's tournament(the difference is small and it may be a statistical >error). > >Uri So it seems i have more information than you that led me to my statement ;-) However a tournament of that kind you suggested would be interesting. Greetings Alex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.