Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Sorry, next try...

Author: Alexander Kure

Date: 11:03:32 08/08/00

Go up one level in this thread


>On August 08, 2000 at 10:49:37, Peter Skinner wrote:
>
>>On August 08, 2000 at 05:07:38, Alexander Kure wrote:
>>
>>>On August 07, 2000 at 23:20:58, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>
>>>>Yes WBNimzo 2000b is stronger than the Nimzo 99 engine, and the 2000 "native"
>>>>engine. It however is a bit weaker than the 7.32 version, but using Winboard
>>>>makes up for the short fall.
>>>>
>>>>The only thing I wiah is that there was a better book for it.
>>>
>>>Funny! I supposed that Nimzo's book is good enough ;-) Or to state it
>>>differently: There is no better book than the Nimzo book ;-)
>>>If you want to add more variety simply set RandomBook=1.
>>>
>>>Greetings
>>>Alex
>>
>>Ok let me refraise that. I wish that there was a better book for the Winboard
>>version of Nimzo 2000b. The standard.nbk is weaker than the normal Nimzo 7.32
>>book.
>>
>>The Nimzo 2000b book is fine, but the 7.32 versions book is fantastic. I just
>>happen to think that the one for WbNimzo2000b is to small, and could be "wider".
>>
>>BTW Alexander, how are my settings... could I change anything to make it play
>>better?

You settings are fine (standard factory settings). If you want to change them
you will have to play many games to confirm that your new settings had improved
Nimzo's play which i doubt you can.
However if you want to test it you can try the follwing settings:

BishopPair=50
MidGameMob=30
EndGameMob=10
KSafty=14
BVal=435
QVal=1290

Greetings
Alex



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.