Author: Michael Cummings
Date: 22:47:42 08/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 08, 2000 at 20:44:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 08, 2000 at 17:21:51, Steven Schwartz wrote: > >>Some questions for our Moderator nominees: >> >>1) On a scale from 1 to 10 with 1 being the most tolerant >>and 10 being the least tolerant, where would you place >>yourself when it comes to posts that are off topic? >> > >How is this to be interpreted? IE I don't like the chessmaster questions/ >threads. So I don't read them. Would I delete them or inject moderator >suggestions that they be stopped? No. > >So if you mean "personally, how do you rate your tolerance for off-topic >posts and do you read them?" I would call myself a 6. If you mean "would >you delete posts...?" then I would call myself a 3. I can live with stuff >I don't read. Maybe I am missing your point here in regard to the Chessmaster example. Now anything regarding chessmaster, or for that matter and other chess program. What would you consider off-topic. So when you say, "would I delete them or inject moderator suggestions that they be stopped ? No", why would this example even regard even thinking that kind of action to be taken ? To posting endless games between personalities or asking for settings for chessmaster, I consider this to be perfectly on topic for this forum. Maybe you are showing your point to the extreme to put across your view, if that is the case then I can understand that. But just because someone does not like a post or thread regarding a certain topic, does not make that off-topic. To me off-topic is anything not regarding computer chess. So I am just confused by your point you are trying to put across. Chessmaster is on topic, if not, can you explain any past posts which would differ in this opinion. No need to dig any up, just of what you remember would be fine. Thanks
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.