Author: Mark Young
Date: 23:28:25 08/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 08, 2000 at 17:37:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 08, 2000 at 16:29:59, walter irvin wrote: > >>On August 08, 2000 at 10:33:34, Peter Hegger wrote: >> >>>Hello, >>>This has probably been done to a certain extent already. I'm wondering how the >>>games of the old masters, i.e. Morphy, Steinitz, Tarrasch etc...stand up under >>>the scrutiny of today's best computers. Are the games still as clean and >>>brilliant as they seemed to be a hundred years ago? Or have they been found to >>>be error ridden relics of days gone by? >>>I'm wondering in particular about the "evergreen" and the "immortal" games. >>>Also, Bobby Fischer's "game of the century" against Byrne. >>>Thanks for any help you can give me. >>>Best Regards, >>>Peter >> i think you will find that the computer almost always out does the master in >>key positions .computers crush just about all players in tactics . > >I disagree. >They are better in short tactics but humans are better in long tactics. > > i guess the >>the big question is could the computer reach a key position vs morphy ect >>??????????? i think there are some old masters that had styles that a computer >>just could not deal with 2 that come to mind are nimzovitch and petrosian .they >>were masters of the closed position game .i think they would have laughed at >>computers .on the other hand tactical masters like marshal morphy ect would have >>got sliced and diced . > >Here is one winning moves of morphy > >[D]r1bq1rk1/ppp3p1/7p/3P2n1/2PQ1p2/1N5P/PPP2PPK/R1B2R2 b - - 0 1 > >Morphy won by Nf3+ >programs need a long time to find this move because they cannot see deep enough. This position is right up Fritz 6a's power alley, it was able to find Nf3+ in less then 1 min. New position r1bq1rk1/ppp3p1/7p/3P2n1/2PQ1p2/1N5P/PPP2PPK/R1B2R2 b - - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 6: 1...Bxh3 +- (3.06) depth: 1/3 00:00:00 1...Bxh3 2.gxh3 +- (3.53) depth: 1/3 00:00:00 1...f3 +- (2.91) depth: 1/5 00:00:00 1...f3 ± (1.37) depth: 1/5 00:00:00 1...f3 2.Bxg5 Qxg5 ± (1.37) depth: 2/8 00:00:00 1...f3 2.Bxg5 Qxg5 3.g3 ± (1.22) depth: 3/12 00:00:00 1...f3 2.Bxg5 Qxg5 3.Rg1 fxg2 4.Rxg2 ± (1.19) depth: 4/12 00:00:00 2kN 1...f3 2.Bxg5 Qxg5 3.Rg1 Qf5 4.Qc3 fxg2 5.Rxg2 ± (1.31) depth: 5/21 00:00:00 13kN 1...f3 2.Bxg5 Qxg5 3.Rg1 Qf5 4.Qc3 fxg2 5.Rxg2 ± (1.31) depth: 6/20 00:00:00 27kN 1...Bxh3! ± (1.28) depth: 6/20 00:00:00 51kN 1...Bxh3 2.f3 Bf5 3.c3 Qe8 4.Bxf4 Qh5+ 5.Kg1 ± (1.28) depth: 7/24 00:00:00 125kN 1...Bxh3 2.f3 Bf5 3.c3 Qe8 4.Bxf4 Qh5+ 5.Kg1 Bd3 ± (1.31) depth: 8/23 00:00:00 260kN 1...f3 ± (1.28) depth: 8/24 00:00:00 314kN 1...f3 2.Bxg5 Qxg5 3.Rg1 Qf5 4.Qc3 Qf4+ 5.g3 Qf5 6.g4 ± (1.16) depth: 9/26 00:00:01 731kN 1...Bxh3 ± (1.12) depth: 9/27 00:00:01 1317kN 1...Bxh3 2.f3 Bc8 3.Bxf4 Ne6 4.dxe6 Qh4+ 5.Kg1 Rxf4 6.Qd5 ± (1.00) depth: 9/27 00:00:02 1698kN 1...Bxh3 2.f3 Bc8 3.Bxf4 Ne6 4.dxe6 Qh4+ 5.Kg1 Rxf4 6.Qd5 ± (1.00) depth: 10/27 00:00:03 2552kN 1...Bxh3 2.f3 Bc8 3.Bxf4 Ne6 4.dxe6 Qh4+ 5.Kg1 Rxf4 6.Qe3 ± (1.09) depth: 11/31 00:00:07 5091kN 1...Bxh3-- +- (1.41) depth: 12/32 00:00:22 16702kN 1...Bxh3 +- (1.41) depth: 12/34 00:00:24 18532kN 1...f3 ± (1.37) depth: 12/34 00:00:29 21596kN 1...f3 2.Bxg5 Qxg5 3.Rg1 Qf5 4.Qc3 Qf4+ 5.g3 Qf5 6.g4 ± (1.16) depth: 12/36 00:00:38 28498kN 1...Nxh3 ± (1.12) depth: 12/36 00:00:47 34730kN 1...Nxh3 2.gxh3 Qh4 3.Rh1 Qxh3+ 4.Kg1 Qg4+ 5.Kf1 Qf3 6.Rg1 ± (1.06) depth: 12/36 00:00:50 37202kN 1...Nf3+ ± (1.03) depth: 12/36 00:00:52 38577kN 1...Nf3+ 2.gxf3 Qh4 3.Rh1 Bxh3 4.c3 Rf6 5.Bxf4 Rxf4 6.Qe3 = (0.25) depth: 12/36 00:00:53 39290kN 1...Nf3+ 2.gxf3 Qh4 3.Rh1 Bxh3 4.c3 Rf6 5.Bxf4 Rxf4 6.Qe3 = (0.00) depth: 13/32 00:00:55 40746kN 1...Nf3+ 2.gxf3 Qh4 3.Rh1 Bxh3 4.c3 Rf6 5.Bxf4 Rxf4 6.Qe3 = (0.00) depth: 14/38 00:01:04 47886kN 1...Nf3+! = (-0.16) depth: 15/35 00:01:37 73480kN 1...Nf3+! 2.gxf3 Qh4 3.Rh1 Bxh3 4.Bxf4 Rxf4 5.Qe3 Rf6 6.Qd4 µ (-0.84) depth: 15/39 00:02:08 97818kN (Young, 09.08.2000) > >They may suggest other sacrifices that are less convincing because white can >avoid accepting them. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.