Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 18:37:13 08/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2000 at 19:03:51, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On August 10, 2000 at 16:43:44, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 10, 2000 at 16:17:47, Christoph Fieberg wrote: >><snipped> >>>Unbelievable, but true: >>>I composed a position which is mate in 1 and can easily found, but Fritz6 on >>>Pentium III, 500 Mhz and 32 MB Hash needs more than 1 hour to show it (excatly >>>1:03:17)!!! >>>How do other computers react? >> >>Fritz6 is a slow searcher. > >>Fast searchers like Hiarcs7.32 need less than 1 second pm p200 to see the mate). > >>Seriously, >>I guess that fritz is confused by the number of possible captures in the >>position and does a lot of capture extensions. > >Frans probably starts to generate the opposite direction. Every program >has a worst case, but an hour for 1 ply is a bit long for 1 ply. > >Diep is seeing a cool check, tries that first. Happens to be mate. > >>Uri Ahh,so Diep belives in the always check, it might be mate proverb? Or does it follow the Patzer see a check, patzer play a check proverb? :))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.