Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 04:46:07 08/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 10, 2000 at 21:37:13, Jason Williamson wrote: >On August 10, 2000 at 19:03:51, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 10, 2000 at 16:43:44, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On August 10, 2000 at 16:17:47, Christoph Fieberg wrote: >>><snipped> >>>>Unbelievable, but true: >>>>I composed a position which is mate in 1 and can easily found, but Fritz6 on >>>>Pentium III, 500 Mhz and 32 MB Hash needs more than 1 hour to show it (excatly >>>>1:03:17)!!! >>>>How do other computers react? >>> >>>Fritz6 is a slow searcher. >> >>>Fast searchers like Hiarcs7.32 need less than 1 second pm p200 to see the mate). >> >>>Seriously, >>>I guess that fritz is confused by the number of possible captures in the >>>position and does a lot of capture extensions. >> >>Frans probably starts to generate the opposite direction. Every program >>has a worst case, but an hour for 1 ply is a bit long for 1 ply. >> >>Diep is seeing a cool check, tries that first. Happens to be mate. >> >>>Uri > >Ahh,so Diep belives in the always check, it might be mate proverb? Or does it >follow the Patzer see a check, patzer play a check proverb? :)) Diep is a patzer :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.