Author: pavel
Date: 00:27:24 08/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2000 at 03:23:17, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 14, 2000 at 03:17:00, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 14, 2000 at 03:01:54, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On August 14, 2000 at 00:13:44, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>On August 13, 2000 at 22:57:11, robert blackwell wrote: >>>> >>>>>can someone show me the winning line because bxa2 is fine! b3 cannot be played >>>>>as bxb3 wins! i hope this was a joke ! or did anyone analyse this. b3 nd5 is the >>>>>mistake! bxb3 is the killer~! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Would you please post a line that wins after Bxa2 b3 Bxb3 Nxb3 as my program >>>>claims white is winning easily here. >>>> >>>>You are down a bishop, up two pawns. That loses. >>> >>> >>>I think you are right and Tiger should not play Bxa2, however after Bxa2 b3 >>>things are not so simple. >>> >>>Tiger 12.8 analysis at 15 plies deep: >>> >>>Nd5 R7e5 Nb4 Ra1 Rxd4 Nf3 Rxd3 cxd3 Bxb3 Rb1 Nxd3 Rxb3 Nxe5 Nxe5 ... >>> >>>score is still +0.58 for black. >>> >>>The problem is that white must defend d4, or else it's a bishop against 3 pawns, >>>and white's queenside is badly shredded. >> >>Crafty played in the game R7e4 and not R7e5. >> >>What is tiger's opinion about the position after R7e4? >>Can tiger win Crafty at longer time control? >> >>If the line is good for black then I expect tiger to win Crafty at longer time >>control. >> >>Uri > >Sorry for writing Tiger with small t and Crafty with big c. > >I guess that it was because of the fact that crafty won the game but I did not >think about it and payed attention to it only after I posted. > >Uri what differance does it make? IMO its rather childish to even worry about it. I am sure they are old and mature enough to not count silly things like that ;) pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.