Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:06:16 08/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2000 at 05:21:25, Jason Williamson wrote: >On August 14, 2000 at 02:38:20, Shanti wrote: > >>On August 13, 2000 at 12:33:36, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>Hi >> >>I fail to see what Shredder 4 rating has to do with the rating of other >>programs. >> >>Shredder 4 is an independent product. Millenium GmbH allowed SSDF to publish its >>results. SSDF guys made a strange decision (Sorry, but I can't understand their >>decision) and demanded that other Millenium products results must be allowed as >>well BEFORE Shredder 4 results are published. >> >>Shanti >> >>>On August 13, 2000 at 12:04:59, Richard Heldmann wrote: >>> >>>>Does anyone know why Shredder 4 is missing from the latest SSDF list? >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>> >>>>Richard >>> >>>Shredder4 is missing because of the fact that the millenium company does not >>>want other programs that they sell to be rated. >>> >>>The ssdf will publish the rating of shredder4 when the millenium will agree to >>>have the rating of other programs like Genius6.5 >>> >>>Shredder4 is probably number 4 in the list because if you download the list in >>>dos format you can see that number 4 is missing. >>> >>>Uri > >Personally, I can't see how they can even stop the SSDF from putting Genius 6.5 >on the list. I mean, thats like saying that I can't match Genius 6.5 on my >computer against other computers and tell you what happens. They cannot stop you from doing it but it is a fact that they can stop the ssdf from doing it. The ssdf guys do not want to go to court even if they win so they prefer not to post results of Genius6.5. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.