Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:14:41 08/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2000 at 00:36:56, Terry Ripple wrote: >On August 14, 2000 at 11:23:12, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 14, 2000 at 10:54:47, Alvaro Rodriguez wrote: >> >>>On August 14, 2000 at 10:46:30, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>190-164(86 draws) is the result of the blitz match between Fritz6light and >>>>Hiarcs7.32 after 440 games. >>>> >>>>If Fritz6light continues in the same way it may get significant result after 800 >>>>games. >>>> >>>>openings were: >>>>openings 1-20:1.a3 a6,1.a3 a5....1.a3 Nh6 >>>>openings 21-40:1.a4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>openings 41-60 1.b3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>openings 61-80 1.b4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>openings 81-100 1.c3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>openings 101-120 1.c4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>openings 121-140 1.d3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>openings 141-160 1.d4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>openings 161-180 1.e3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>openings 181-200 1.e4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>openings 201-220 1.f3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>> >>>>Fritz6light lost 11 games on time. >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>>How many did Hiarcs 7.32 lose on time? And what is the time-control ? >>> >>>Regards, >>>Alvaro >> >>time control is 5 minutes per game. >>Hiarcs did not lose games on time. >>hardware pentiumIII450. >> >>More details: >> >>hiarcs7.32 used 128 Mbytes hash tables because I know that the programmer said >>that bigger hash tables are better. >> >>Fritz6Light used 8 mbytes in the first 164 games and 32 mbytes in the rest of >>the games. >> >>Hiarcs was leading after 164 games 69-66(29 draws) >> >>I thought that Fritz6light lose on time because of big hash tables but I >>discovered that this is not the reason(Fritz6light cannot use more than 32 >>mbytes hash tables so there was no point in giving it more hash tables). >> >>Old version of Fritz do not like big hash tables in blitz but fritz6light has no >>problem with them and big hash tables is not the reason for losing some long >>games on time. >> >>Uri > >Hi Uri, >It seems that this Fritz6 Light version is not the "Old" but the newer version >because it's really kicking Hiarcs732's ass! Plus in my 60 min.games, Fritz >Light won against Hiarcs with a wopping score of 20.5 to 9.5 with no games lost >on time by Fritz6 Light. I know this is only 30 games but i don't believe that >Hiarcs could ever bring the score much closer than this difference is now! > >Terry It cannot be the new version because I know that Fritz6light is a root processor when Fritz6 is better. The fact that Fritz6light beats Hiarcs7.32 does not prove that Fritz6 is not even better. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.