Author: Chris Taylor
Date: 02:31:22 08/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2000 at 15:24:30, Chessfun wrote: >On August 14, 2000 at 03:01:17, Chris Taylor wrote: > >>On August 13, 2000 at 12:04:59, Richard Heldmann wrote: >> >>>Does anyone know why Shredder 4 is missing from the latest SSDF list? >>> >>>Regards, >>> >>>Richard >> >>I am playing a two computer match with Shredder 4.00 on a celeron 500 >>and tiger 12.0e on an AMD 500 >> >>After 12 games, 1 hour each, we have.......T12-6½ S4-5½ >>So against the strong Tiger, Shredder is also showing its claws >> >>Afew more details: Shredder is playing with all 3,4 and 5 piece endgame >>databases, all sounds are OFF, and it has 128 meg of ram. Its settings are >>defaulted. >>Tiger is playing with 64 meg ram, and is under the latest upgrade options! >> >>Tiger seems to like the AMD and Shredder likes the Celeron, Yipee? >> >>Chris Taylor > > >Hi Chris, > In the 40 min blitz tourney you played, that is posted at my >Website Tiger 12.0e won 7-2, over Shredder 4.0. What made you play these >two? What about Fritz 6 v Tiger #1 and 3 on the SSDF list. And in that same >40 min tourney they split 4.5 each and finished 1st and 2nd. > >Thanks. I wanted to see what Shredder would do on the faster Celeron? As soon as I loaded it, I noticed the nps higher. This indicated it liked my celeron? Plus after my 10 gig drive crashed, and I got a replacement of 13 gig. There is room for all the 3,4 & 5 endgame bases. It has it all, faster nps, more of a clue on certain endings. What can it do with it?? Whilst I am at work, the tin monsters can bash each other to submission. S4 has gone up from an, AMD400 to a Cel_500.. Since Tiger likes AMD it has the 500. Does this seem fair?? Does to me! Next up then Fritz 6a v Tiger 12.0e Chris Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.