Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 11:49:43 08/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2000 at 01:14:41, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 15, 2000 at 00:36:56, Terry Ripple wrote: > >>On August 14, 2000 at 11:23:12, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On August 14, 2000 at 10:54:47, Alvaro Rodriguez wrote: >>> >>>>On August 14, 2000 at 10:46:30, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>190-164(86 draws) is the result of the blitz match between Fritz6light and >>>>>Hiarcs7.32 after 440 games. >>>>> >>>>>If Fritz6light continues in the same way it may get significant result after 800 >>>>>games. >>>>> >>>>>openings were: >>>>>openings 1-20:1.a3 a6,1.a3 a5....1.a3 Nh6 >>>>>openings 21-40:1.a4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>>openings 41-60 1.b3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>>openings 61-80 1.b4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>>openings 81-100 1.c3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>>openings 101-120 1.c4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>>openings 121-140 1.d3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>>openings 141-160 1.d4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>>openings 161-180 1.e3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>>openings 181-200 1.e4 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>>openings 201-220 1.f3 with all the possible rplies of black >>>>> >>>>>Fritz6light lost 11 games on time. >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>>> >>>>How many did Hiarcs 7.32 lose on time? And what is the time-control ? >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>>Alvaro >>> >>>time control is 5 minutes per game. >>>Hiarcs did not lose games on time. >>>hardware pentiumIII450. >>> >>>More details: >>> >>>hiarcs7.32 used 128 Mbytes hash tables because I know that the programmer said >>>that bigger hash tables are better. >>> >>>Fritz6Light used 8 mbytes in the first 164 games and 32 mbytes in the rest of >>>the games. >>> >>>Hiarcs was leading after 164 games 69-66(29 draws) >>> >>>I thought that Fritz6light lose on time because of big hash tables but I >>>discovered that this is not the reason(Fritz6light cannot use more than 32 >>>mbytes hash tables so there was no point in giving it more hash tables). >>> >>>Old version of Fritz do not like big hash tables in blitz but fritz6light has no >>>problem with them and big hash tables is not the reason for losing some long >>>games on time. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Hi Uri, >>It seems that this Fritz6 Light version is not the "Old" but the newer version >>because it's really kicking Hiarcs732's ass! Plus in my 60 min.games, Fritz >>Light won against Hiarcs with a wopping score of 20.5 to 9.5 with no games lost >>on time by Fritz6 Light. I know this is only 30 games but i don't believe that >>Hiarcs could ever bring the score much closer than this difference is now! >> >>Terry > >It cannot be the new version because I know that Fritz6light is a root processor >when Fritz6 is better. > >The fact that Fritz6light beats Hiarcs7.32 does not prove that Fritz6 is not >even better. > >Uri This is also very "true"!!! Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.