Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 11:58:04 08/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 15, 2000 at 11:26:26, pavel wrote: >On August 15, 2000 at 11:03:13, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 15, 2000 at 09:28:55, Daniel Chancey wrote: >> >>>Vicent, please do not reply to my messages again. >>> >>>Castle2000 >> >>then don't post such nonsense. i don't post the 10000 blitz games DIEP >>plays at the internet either unless there is something really weird in >>a certain game going on. > >think what you are saying ........... > >what is "nonsense" to you is "interesting" to others. >you may not like results of 1000s of games or even 1 games between programs. >but in this forum there are lots of people who are involved in games between >chess programs and results.....etc. > >also you said "then dont post such nonsence" .....hehe >do you only reply to nonsense posts? >lol > >pavel I found the game actually interesting. I didn't think it was none sense to begin with. 1 game matches are hardly conclusive, but still one game can produce possible book holes, eval errors, and other elements involved the outcome. Maybe I should post more replies in the "nonsense" catagory. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.