Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: You don't know that

Author: Alvaro Rodriguez

Date: 11:58:35 08/15/00

Go up one level in this thread


On August 15, 2000 at 14:37:57, Uri Blass wrote:

>On August 15, 2000 at 13:40:04, Severi Salminen wrote:
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>>In my humble opinion, I think Chessmaster 6K or 7K is "stronger" than Crafty
>>>17.13, so I'm not surprised.
>>
>>How on earth can you say that (well, of course I am not to say what you can say
>>or can't, but... ;)? Crafty 17.13 isn't even released yet. And besides, this is
>>not a matter of opinions. What do we mean when we say that a program is stronger
>>than another? I think we all agree that the program which gets more points
>>against another program is stronger, when number of games --> infinity, period.
>
>
>I  disagree.
>
>By this definition chessmaster is weaker than most of the programs because
>chessmaster has no learning function and after enough games it may start to lose
>the same game again and again.
>
>Suppose someone does a program that learn from experience but it needs
>1000000000000000 games in order to start to play better than kasparov.
>
>By your definition this  program is the strongest program in the world but the
>practical test will show you that this program lose again and again because you
>will practically never get enough games.

Come one Uri :-) Who will play 1000000000 games between two programs? And
manually because Chessmaster doesn´t support Auto232 ( yet ) :-)

>
>
>>And if people knew more about statistics they wouldn't make so many posts like
>>"Crafty won Rebel 1-0!! Something wrong with Rebel????" When two programs are
>>very equal you need many (100+ or even 1000+) games to see the true relation. 1
>>game means allmost nothing. One game means _a little_, but can't draw any
>>general conclusions on just one game...IMHO... :)
>>
>>Severi
>
>
>If a program wins one game against another program then it will be more logical
>to guess that the winner is better than the opposite so it is logical to have
>the opinion that the winner is better.
>
>You can change your opinion when you get more information.
>
>Uri

I agree

Regards,
Alvaro



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.