Author: Uri Blass
Date: 16:29:07 08/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 17, 2000 at 14:21:30, Christoph Fieberg wrote: >On August 17, 2000 at 13:52:51, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 16, 2000 at 06:40:10, Christoph Fieberg wrote: >> >>>>>>1.Lxd2 Sf6+ 2.gxh8S Txh8+ 3.Th7 fxg1D 4.c8D exd1D 5.bxa8D >>> >>>>>I think that this line is not a draw. >>> >>>>>White wins by 5.d8Q+(possible lines 5...Kg3 6.Qd6+ Kf2 7.Qd4+ Kf1 8.Qcc4+ Qe2 >>>>>9.Qxe2+ Kxe2 10.Nxg1+ hxg1 11.Qxg1 or 5...Rxc8 6.bxc8Q+ Kg3 7.Qd6+ Kf2 8.Qcc5+) >>>>> >>>>>Uri >>> >>>I agree that after 4.c8D exd1D 5.d8Q+! (instead of 5.bxa8Q) White will win. >>> >>>But what about the preventive 4....Kg3 (instead of exd1D). Is this also a forced >>>win for White? At the moment I analyse it with Fritz6 (will take some time). >>> >>>Regards, >>>Christoph >> >>I did not analyze the position but only gave it to Junior5.9. >> >>after 4...Kg3 Junior5.9 fails high on the move Rxh8 >> >>evaluation at depth 13(after the typical 0.3 addition for fail high moves) is >>1.03 pawns for white. >> >>I used pentium200MMX for 2 hours to get the evaluation(my pentiumIII450 is busy >>in another task). >> >>Uri > >Hi Uri, >I agree that 4...Kg3 is not sufficient - but in the meantime I found a line >after 1... Ng5+!! which seems to be a forced win for Black! Check this: > >1.... Ng5+!! 2.gxh8Q Rxh8+ 3.Rh7 fxg1Q! 4.e8Q Rxh7+ 5.gxh7 h1Q 6.Bxc2 Kg3+ >7.Kxg5 Qc5+ 8.Qe5+ Qxe5+ 9.Nxe5 Qh4+ 10.Kg6 b1Q 11.c8Q Qb6+ 12.Qc6 Qg4+ 13.Kh6 >a1Q 14.Rxa1 Rxa1 -+ Hi christhophe, Junior5.9 agrees that 1...Ng5+ is better. Main line after few hours on p200MMX begins with: 1...Ng5+ 2.gxh8Q Rxh8+ 3.Rh7 fxg1Q 4.Bxc2 b1Q 5.c8Q Rxh7+ The evaluation is 2.46 pawns for black at depth 13(1725726 knodes) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.