Author: Chris Carson
Date: 07:54:32 08/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On August 18, 2000 at 09:21:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 18, 2000 at 00:16:04, Peter Kappler wrote: > >>On August 17, 2000 at 21:59:37, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On August 17, 2000 at 17:22:18, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>We only know about Dr Hyatt computer since he annouces it 5 days ago. But why >>>>Chessbase does not announces what hardwares they will be using and the same for >>>>other with good possibility of winning such as Chess Tiger 12.9 and Shredder 5. >>>>They need to bring the best hardware possible that can match Dr Hyatt Alpha >>>>system, since Crafty has proven to be playing a la par with the very best >>>>ptrograms using comparable hardwares. >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>> >>>I don't think our alpha is going to turn out to be very fast. I think we >>>will be doing maybe 400K nodes per second. A shame, but there was little time >>>to try to get a "real good alpha"... >>> >>>It will still 'play chess' of course. :) >> >> >> >>What kind of Alpha are you getting, and what would you have considered a "real >>good alpha"?. >> >>--Peter > >The 21264A running at 667mhz or faster would be a "good alpha". The 21264 at >500 is an "OK alpha". IE we aren't going to be hurting at all, but we could >run probably twice as fast. Here are the Specint2000: Alpha 500 300 Alpha 667 424 PIII 1G 438 Alpha 833 511 To bad you could not get the 833. :) Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.